My Top Five P2P Lending Predictions for 2013

Happy New Year everyone. I hope 2013 is treating you well so far. On January 1st of 2012 I made five predictions for p2p lending in 2012, so now it is time to go back and review how I did. I will also make five new predictions for 2013.

Review of my 2012 predictions

  1. Lending Club will reach $1 billion in total loans – this was by no means a certainty as we started 2012 but I expected Lending Club would break this milestone in December. They did it a month earlier.
  2. Prosper will reach $500 million in total loans – Prosper ended the year at $443 million in total loans issued since inception, so I was a bit too optimistic on this one.
  3. Lending Club will post a profitable quarter – this one probably has come true but we will have to wait a while to know for sure. In the third quarter of 2012 Lending Club posted a quarter where they were cash flow positive and I expect they will carry that momentum over to the last quarter and show profitability for the first time.
  4. A third competitor will take on Prosper and Lending Club – I was completely wrong on this point as no real competitor emerged in 2012. Peerform are still around but they are only available to accredited investors and they were pretty quiet this year – they are not a direct competitor at this stage.
  5. More states will become available for investors – there was no movement here whatsoever as the number of states available to investors at both companies remained static.

My 2013 p2p lending predictions

So now we move to this year. I have a feeling that 2013 is going to be a great year for p2p lending investors. Returns will continue to be good and the industry will maintain the solid growth of the past couple of years. So, here are my top five predictions for this year. I will be sure to check back in 365 days to see how I did.

  1. Lending Club will issue $1.62 billion in loans in 2013
    I expect the incredible growth rate of Lending Club in 2012 (179% year over year growth) to slow down somewhat in 2013. Still, with investor money continuing to pour in and an IPO on the horizon I expect another stellar year. But I am predicting the growth rate to fall to around 120-125% in 2013.
  2. Prosper will issue $340 million in loans in 2013
    Despite a very rough fourth quarter of 2012 I expect Prosper to have a much better year in 2013 and their growth rate should increase over 2012. But they will remain a distant number two in the p2p lending race.
  3. The Prosper class action lawsuit is settled
    A class action lawsuit was filed against Prosper in November 2008 that has been dragging on now for over four years. I believe that in 2013 this lawsuit will be finally put behind us. If Prosper does not win the suit, I think it will be settled anyway. Either way, the matter should be put to bed in 2013.
  4. Peer to Business Lending Will Boom With at Least Five New Companies
    In the UK peer to business lending is booming, but in the U.S. there are still virtually no companies (aside from U-Haul) that allow individuals to lend money to companies on an easy to use platform like Lending Club or Prosper. I think that will change in 2013. While the JOBS Act will allow equity investing for the masses, I am only talking about debt – loaning money to businesses. I think this cousin of p2p lending will boom in 2013.
  5. Lending Club will release a bankruptcy remote vehicle for all investors
    With LC Advisors, Lending Club has had a bankruptcy remote vehicle for large investors for some time. But retail investors have enjoyed no such protection. I think with the recent approval of Prosper Funding LLC, Lending Club will provide something similar to all investors in 2013.

What do you think? Do you have any predictions of your own. As always I would like to hear your comments.

Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William
William
Jan. 2, 2013 12:20 am

I agree with almost all of your predictions. But I’m not sure #5 will happen. For #5 to happen there will need to be some pressure from investors and as priuspilot put it “99% of their retail investors have no idea about this issue”. So I don’t think LC will do it if there is no pressure from investors.

Dan B
Dan B
Jan. 2, 2013 4:19 pm
Reply to  Peter Renton

William………….I have little doubt that you are correct in that the majority of retail investors aren’t aware of this issue.

Peter………….I have no doubt that a lot of the retail investors “you communicate with” bring up this concern. So both you & William can be correct on this issue.

What I think is the more important concern though is that those of us who are aware of this continue to highlight it as much as possible (in a calm manner) so that LC is encouraged to add this layer of protection for retail investors asap.

Jburg
Jburg
Jan. 2, 2013 1:42 pm

I believe Prosper will update their overall Platform and Pricing model. Not to mention the website in general. The Bankruptcy vehicle makes me wonder who it will ultimately benefit. Lending club, in my opinion, has better long term management and pricing. No urgency needed, to rush into a remote BKPT vehicle if platform has positive returns. I also believe LC will offer more data fields to investors. The lack of specific portfolio data, i.e. YTM, restricts investors from modeling portfolios with different interest rate environments.

Dan B
Dan B
Jan. 2, 2013 5:46 pm
Reply to  Jburg

I’m sorry but to the best of my understanding this particular bk remote vehicle has nothing whatsoever to do with whether the “platform has positive returns” or not. It does not in any way protect investors if the platform doesn’t have positive returns. It is designed to protect investors if the “platform” aka, the business fails. Two very different issues.

Peerlend
Jan. 2, 2013 8:09 pm
Reply to  Jburg

Having the notes in a protected entity shields investors from (what you call) “platform” risk beyond just “going concern” risk. There are a variety of things that could put a platform at risk legally aside from “not being cashflow positive” and ALL – big and small – should have identical protection from having their investments subject to those risks. All else is unjust.

Julie
Jan. 2, 2013 2:13 pm

Hi Peter,

Can you please elaborate here or provide a link to better explain “bankruptcy remote vehicle”? Thanks!

Roy S.
Roy S.
Jan. 2, 2013 3:03 pm

This is more of a (really rather small) hope (in the grand scheme of things) than a prediction. I hope that Prosper will allow people to finish off loans that have less than $25 to go to fully fund it. I am currently invested in a loan that I tried to finish off, but I get an error. Instead, I have to wait another 8 days (I tried to fully fund it 2 days ago) for the listing to expire–that’s over a week that my investment could be earning interest that Prosper could actually do something about. I think there are another half dozen or so loans in the same predicament. If they aren’t going to let people finish off the loans with less than $25 left to fully fund them, then they should allow someone to fund all but $15 of a loan. It’s a very, VERY small annoyance, but it just adds to everything else…

Peerlend
Jan. 2, 2013 8:17 pm
Reply to  Roy S.

Yes – I’ve made a similar suggestion in that I am slightly annoyed that I cannot add less than $25 to a loan which I’ve already invested at least $25 in, once. EG, on my first pass I invest $25, and, on my second filtration pass, I may wish to add $10 to increase my exposure w/in that particular loan. Currently I can’t do that. I was not aware that you cannot “finish” a loan with < the minimum bid increment, but, if that's indeed the case, more reason to rework the bidding logic…

Roy S.
Roy S.
Jan. 3, 2013 12:12 pm
Reply to  Peerlend

I didn’t even think of adding additional to any of my bids–I looked, and you’re right that I can’t add to my position. In the past, I’ve just invested a second time and Prosper consolidates both bids into one loan after the Note is issued. Maybe having an additional function in the pending offers to add to your original bid would resolve that issue. But again, while it is a little annoying to wait over a week for a loan to finish because it has less than $25 less is annoying as an investor (I’m not sure how the borrowers feel about it, though!), it is not a very big issue issue in the large scheme of things. I just noticed it a few days ago, and it doesn’t appear to affect that many loans. NOT a high priority by any means.

Neal S.
Neal S.
Jan. 3, 2013 1:21 pm
Reply to  Roy S.

@Roy,

If a loan has less than $25 remaining, you can place a bid for the remaining amount and it will be accepted. I have three of them in my portfolio.

Note that I wasn’t trying to add to a prior investment…it just happened that I was “Last one in” on these notes.

If you have $0.08 available and want to try it, you can finish off listing 690288 before it expires next wed.

Neal

Roy S.
Roy S.
Jan. 3, 2013 2:49 pm
Reply to  Neal S.
Neal S.
Neal S.
Jan. 3, 2013 9:54 pm
Reply to  Roy S.

@Roy,

You are correct, I’m getting the system error also. However, it used to work. Check out either of these listings which were finished off with investments < $25.

https://www.prosper.com/invest/listing.aspx?listingID=577394
https://www.prosper.com/invest/listing.aspx?listingID=567803

But those are from March/April 2012…

Roy S.
Roy S.
Jan. 5, 2013 11:42 am
Reply to  Neal S.

I think Peter might be correct that it is a bug in the system. I’m not sure whether Prosper even knows about it, since it doesn’t appear to affect every listing. Even if they were on Prosper’s radar, it affects so few I doubt that it is high on their priority list…it wouldn’t be on mine.

Mike Craig
Jan. 3, 2013 7:23 am

The explosion that is peer to peer investing and lending will continue to be the story in 2013. I am still telling my friends at IBO and at my own site about the power of P2P. Keep providing the best information in the industry from which to do due diligence.
As a person who lives in an orphan state, I’m looking forward to P2P truly going coast to coast into every state.

Matthew Allen
Jan. 4, 2013 1:04 pm

It’s too bad that one of your predictions for 2013 isn’t that P2P will start to get more mainstream attention both from the borrowing and the lending side. It could be that big money (the banks) control the media outlets and don’t want this alternative way of lending money to become mainstream. Less profits for them. We may have to keep pushing forward grassroots style to get the word out about this transforming industry.

Sandy
Jan. 4, 2013 7:50 pm

Peter,

I’ve been having problems with Prosper lately that has me jumping over to Lending Club. I’m bearish on Prosper’s growth probabilities and very bullish on LendingClub. There is a clear winner here between the two competitors.

Andrew N
Andrew N
Jan. 6, 2013 1:58 pm
Reply to  Sandy

I definitely agree with you Sandy. I recently sold all of my Prosper notes in order to move on to other investments.