Lending Club Stats Now Include Recovery Rate

Lending Club Bad Debt Recovery Rates

Last week Lending Club quietly made the addition of recovery rates to their performance page. The graphic above (click on it for the full size version) shows recovering rates for all their p2p loans that were not current as of the end of August 2010.

What Does Recovery Rate Mean?

First let’s define what they mean by recovery rate. When a loan enters the “In Grace Period” it means the borrower is late on their loan payment. In Grace Period means the loan payment is between 1 and 15 days late. They become officially late if the payment has not been made within 15 days of the due date.

In this chart above, what Lending Club has done is look at all the loans that were not current at the end of August 2010. They took a six month period and worked out how many of these loans were recovered. You can see that 83% of loans that were officially In Grace Period  at the end of August had been fully or partially recovered by the end of February 2011.

Now, they do say fully or partially recovered and so you might think that there would be a big difference between the two, but this is not the case. Let’s provide an example to illustrate. Say a borrower has a $20,000 loan with a $500 monthly payment. In August 2010 he falls behind and and enters the Late (15-30 days) category. To be included in the recovery numbers the borrower must have made full payments on all his past due balances. I double checked this with Lending Club.

So to take our example further this borrower must have made at least $2,500 in loan payments (excluding late fees) to have been considered fully or partially recovered. To be included as partially recovered the final loan payment (to bring the account current) must have only had a portion paid. If it was not made at all then it would have been included again in one of the late categories.

Why is Recovery Rate Important?

According to the chart above there is an 83% chance that a loan will be recovered from In Grace Period, a 75% chance that a loan will be recovered from 15-30 days late and (most surprising to me) a 55% chance the loan will be recovered if 31-120 days late. This is good news for those people who have just noticed one of their loans slip into Late status.

Many people assume that if a loan in your portfolio moves into In Grace Period then it is most likely going to default. These stats from Lending Club point out that this is not really true. I know from personal experience that many of my loans have gone into In Grace Period or even 31-120 days late and then they return to current and the borrower continues making monthly payments on time.

Now, I know many investors sell their notes on the trading platform as soon as they enter the In-Grace Period status. This may well be prudent if you can get close to the face value of the note, but if you are taking a 25% hit on the value of these notes then maybe you should reconsider.

My Take on This Change

This is a step in the right direction for Lending Club in that it provides more data for investors. But more needs to be done. Ideally the statistics page at Lending Club should be more interactive and more like the loan filter at Lendstats.com. Lending Club has all the data, but they are not allowing investors to access it easily. In talks with Lending Club management they have indicated their intention to provide a much better statistical analysis page in the future which would be a welcome addition for many investors.

While both Lending Club and Prosper provide their entire loan database for download, neither company provides a robust front end to inquire into that database. While I applaud Lending Club for providing this additional information there is still no way to run filters on their entire database except through a third party site like Lendstats.com.

Lending Club has indicated that they will be updating their recovery rates monthly. It will be interesting to see the trends in these numbers. Right now, I think they are better than most people (I speak for myself at least) expected. But it would be great if they get even better.

Peter Renton is the chairman and co-founder of LendIt Fintech, the world’s first and largest digital media and events company focused on fintech.

LendIt Fintech conducts three conferences a year for the leading fintech markets of the USA, Europe, and Latin America. LendIt also provides cutting-edge content all year long via audio, video, and written channels.

Peter has been writing about fintech since 2010 and he is the author and creator of the Fintech One-on-One Podcast, the first and longest-running fintech interview series.

Peter has been interviewed by the Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, The New York Times, CNBC, CNN, Fortune, NPR, Fox Business News, the Financial Times, and dozens of other publications.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dan B
Dan B
Mar. 18, 2011 11:01 pm

Ok this whole “fully” or “partially” recovered line doesn’t work for me because it’s way too nebulous. So if a note goes late & the borrower makes 1 payment & then disappears then that note counts as partially recovered?? Well that’s comforting. I mean come on. Why the smoke & mirrors? What this category should show is what percentage of notes return from each of the categories to being “CURRENT” again. It’s as simple as that.

And incidentally………..why look at just the ones that went bad on Aug 2010 when you have over 3 1/2 years worth of historical data? Why not look at all the notes since the beginning that have entered into each of the “late” categories & what percentage came back to being current & remained current?? That’d be a true recovery rate that actually means something.

But the thing that bothers me the most is that I know that “they” are aware of all these arguments that I’ve laid out…………………& they still decided to come out with this crap!

Lou
Lou
Mar. 19, 2011 6:56 am

This data allows us to create a Probability tree.
https://pulse.yahoo.com/_7DEK2HLF4NMSFD7OPKSUIKAVBY/album/photos/413096

If you have 100 loans go into the Grace Period, statistically speaking, approximately 2 (1.86) will end up in Default (according to the Data Lending Club posted).

Sincerely,
-LL
Herndon, VA

Dan B
Dan B
Mar. 19, 2011 10:56 am

@Lou………that doesn’t sound right & just can’t be right. But, if you think it is correct then I encourage you to go to the secondary market & scoop up all the “in grace period” notes that are selling at 4, 5, 10+% discounts. If you’re correct 98 out of every 100 you buy will go back to being current.

@Peter……….. I don’t know what came over me when I wrote my last post because I can’t imagine why anyone would doubt the accuracy & pure intentions of anything that’s supplied by a p2p lending company. By providing these unbelievably useful pieces of information, LC has set a new standard of “transparency” that all of us can only hope to aspire to………….LOL

Lou
Lou
Mar. 19, 2011 11:09 am

I think the discrepancy has to do with what Dan B pointed out, the loan may get current for awhile and then slip back into Grace Period or Late. So, the Probability tree is just a snapshot of what could happen to a loan, whereas the 3% default rate is comparing total loans to defaults. I could be wrong and it could be a rounding error on LC’s part. I’m not a statistics expert either and my initial analysis was based on my memory, but I did crack open my old textbook to check it.

-LL

Mike
Mike
Mar. 19, 2011 5:16 pm

Wonder what the recovery rates are for Chapter 7 bankruptcies….had another one in the last few days. An A3 loan, no less! LC will figure out a way to make it seem like it’ll be greater than 50%, I’m sure.

Dan B
Dan B
Mar. 20, 2011 3:07 am

@Peter……….Then that’s not transparency at all. Transparency requires the disclosure of both the good & the bad. Most businesses don’t disclose the bad………….but then they don’t claim to practice transparency either. Selectively disclosing only the favorable details that help grow your business while implying that you’re being transparent in your disclosures can even be interpreted by some to be outright deception.

Dan B
Dan B
Mar. 21, 2011 3:33 pm

@Peter………Well I’m not sure if anyone actually gives a crap about the “inner workings” of their management team………….. In addition, I for one have little faith in any of their “detailed financial projections” & their “relationships with VC”, at least their financial ones are filed with the SEC & therefore public information.

As much as I’d like to applaud you volunteering that you derive some income from these companies, I think everyone here with a quarter of a brain already knew that. You Peter are after all, more often than not, the lone voice that comes to the defense of LC when a sharp criticism is made. And that’s fine & understandable. The question that I’m sure you’ve already considered is at what point you & this blog becomes perceived as nothing more than a mouthpiece of the p2p companies…………….& whether you care or not if/when it does become that. I don’t think you’re there yet, but…………….

Aaron
Aaron
Mar. 22, 2011 5:14 pm

I am not a statistics EXPERT, but I think I know why Lou’s numbers looks so strange to most of us. There is no need for Lou to do any math. Here is the text directly under the graphs:

How to read these graphs: of the loans in Grace Period in August 2010, 83% was partially or fully recovered by February 2011.

You see, 83% of every loan that went into grace period in the month of August was not recovered. That means a whopping 17% was doomed as soon as the grace period began.

The thing that gets me is that they include the first two graphs in 15 day increments. That could potentially mean that LC uses a single loan that goes into grace period on August 1st and uses it for both graphs. The same hold true for the 30-120 days late graph. These are all statistics of what EVENT occured in August and not the cumulative totals that we assume when looking at the graphs.

Dan B
Dan B
Mar. 23, 2011 6:07 am

This whole “late” thing is so much more complicated than it needs to be. In any case, in an effort to be more fair & more balanced than Fox News, I’ll throw this little twist into the equation & state that in some instances late notes aren’t necessarily that disastrous.

I have 2 late notes left in my portfolio right now. They have been in late status since August & September 2010 respectively. They’re both on payment plans & have made 7 payments (principal & interest) & 5 payments (interest only) respectively since going late. Though I completely understand that this is not a typical situation, it does point out that in these specific instances Lending Club paints a picture that’s a bit dimmer than it actually is by keeping these notes as “late” even though they’re making monthly payments………….but have not caught up on a payment they previously skipped.